| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ZILVER Stage 10 - bigger injectors

Joined: 24 May 2006 Posts: 1384 Location: Auckland
1990 Nissan 300ZX NA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Usually the variable of the transmission gear ratio gets omitted from dyno runs (likely unknown) but it should be a factor of the final calculation.
However 2079x.7(5th gear approximation) =1455Nm hmmm its still nuclear.
(750~1000HP ?)
| Quote: | | But it is torgue that will pull like a schoolboy with his first copy of penthouse at low revs out of a corner |
While torque is good, you wont see to many tractors hooning around corners all that quickly
Drive ratios and Horse Power need to be factored as well to better determine acceleration. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NozMonkeys Stage 9 - ported throttle bodies

Joined: 26 Mar 2009 Posts: 1008 Location: Whangarei
1990 Nissan 300ZX NA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I just bolt stuff on to make mine go faster  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TT_ZX Stage 7 - radiator, intercoolers

Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Posts: 577 Location: Auckland
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
From what I have seen, a dyno run is done in 4th, ie 1:1. Therefore the torque at the wheels would equal to flywheel torque multiplied by the diff ratio minus friction loss. I cant see much point in comparing torque readings at the wheels. You could do a dyno run in 1st gear and get a really high number to brag to ya Honda driving mates . _________________ When in doubt................C4! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zeeman Stage 7 - radiator, intercoolers
Joined: 17 Apr 2008 Posts: 615 Location: North Shore
1989 Nissan 300ZX TT
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah thats right, 4th gear pulls so its 1:1.
Most of the time you will see dyno guys then factor in the diff ratio or something crazy stuff like that which is completely retarded. Wheel hp is whatever is getting put down on the rollers, why some people then add correction factors is beyond me.
2079 / 3.69 = 563.
For some reason the ratio in the dyno sheet says 3.75, 2079/3.75 = 554
300kw, 563 (or 554) nm torque. Does that sound more realistic? I certainly think so.
While I am not saying that this is exactly what has happened here, if the dyno is done properly I bet you its going to be something around that mark judging from past experience. _________________ it is surprising how well things bounce at 50kph
| ZILVER wrote: | | (Needs to be perfect condition) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZILVER Stage 10 - bigger injectors

Joined: 24 May 2006 Posts: 1384 Location: Auckland
1990 Nissan 300ZX NA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ive never dabbeled with a dyno run myself - was just theorising earlier, that some variable unique to the model of car can radically sque results.
| Quote: | | judging from past experience |
I know you're in the know though  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zeeman Stage 7 - radiator, intercoolers
Joined: 17 Apr 2008 Posts: 615 Location: North Shore
1989 Nissan 300ZX TT
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lets just say i have seen 1 or 2 pulls around the 300kw+ mark and they don't have 2k nm _________________ it is surprising how well things bounce at 50kph
| ZILVER wrote: | | (Needs to be perfect condition) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mungyz Master Event Runnerer

Joined: 25 Dec 2005 Posts: 4296 Location: The Mighty Waikato
1990 Nissan 300ZX TT
|
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
OK here are a couple of points being overlooked here:
Rolling road dynos NEVER show true torque @ the wheels or at the engine, they can't plain & simple there are too many variables for any man, machine or calculation to state the actual figure.
Torque is an equation of force times distance, if the distance (IE diameter of the tyre) is changing constantly you can not do the maths plain & simple. Ever watched the tyres while a high HP car was on a rolling road? ever watched them squirm around & deform = bye bye any chance of a decent reading.
All rolling road dynos are built with a large amount of guess factor in the calculations, most guess wrong & then adjust the final reading to something that makes more sense = useless, only good for comparing changes to the same car on that same dyno.
Hub dynos are obviously bolted to the hubs & therefore can show the torque being delivered to the hubs, drive train losses are still an unknown but can be estimated more accurately with decent hub dynos.
Correction factor is used to eliminate the variables of air temp, humidity, atmospheric pressure etc. all these things affect performance so there are calculations made to obtain a reading as if these variables were at a known constant (sea level @ standard atmospheric pressure & standard humidity)
The same correction calculations should be used no mater what dyno you use.
Take a look at my hub dyno print out (in the garage) : 337Kw & 2597Nm
The bulk of modified turbo engines make more HP by increasing boost & therefore torque, it is not all that common for them to produce more revs to make the extra power. (Maybe 10% go to the trouble of increasing RPM)
Back on topic:
I have no idea why you would spend so much on a car then sell it
Current market value for that car is ~ $12000 if you are lucky rebuilt engines are worth nothing when the car is up for sale unless you have hard evidence it has been done right & will last with no issues - that seems to be lacking a little here but maybe it's the way it comes across via the advert. _________________ Always blow on the pie
Safer communities together. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zeeman Stage 7 - radiator, intercoolers
Joined: 17 Apr 2008 Posts: 615 Location: North Shore
1989 Nissan 300ZX TT
|
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Correction factor is used to eliminate the variables of air temp, humidity, atmospheric pressure etc. |
I should of been clearer, I wasn't referring to SAE corrections. I was referring to gear/ratio corrections.
End of the day like I've said before its easy to double check whether a dyno is accurate or not. Can't argue with physics.
Torque (ft lbs) = (5252 x HP ) / RPM
or
5252 = (Torque (ft lbs) x RPM) / HP
Anyway I am not going to continue any further because it seems like I will start stepping on people's toes if i do.
| Quote: | | I have no idea why you would spend so much on a car then sell it |
That's what I am thinking,  _________________ it is surprising how well things bounce at 50kph
| ZILVER wrote: | | (Needs to be perfect condition) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mungyz Master Event Runnerer

Joined: 25 Dec 2005 Posts: 4296 Location: The Mighty Waikato
1990 Nissan 300ZX TT
|
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
No toes were harmed in the above posts
I agree with what you have said re easy to spot bung readings, it's well known how to check them & (not having a go at you zeeman) on a lot of overseas forums it is thrown around waaaay to much in efforts to disprove power figures.
This is where the rolling road thing comes in to a shady area, a lot of the print outs will show torque at the rollers but NOT the torque figure used to make the power calculation (because they know the torque at the rollers is wrong for the actual calculation).
When's our next dyno day? _________________ Always blow on the pie
Safer communities together. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zeeman Stage 7 - radiator, intercoolers
Joined: 17 Apr 2008 Posts: 615 Location: North Shore
1989 Nissan 300ZX TT
|
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
After my car gets fixed would be good!  _________________ it is surprising how well things bounce at 50kph
| ZILVER wrote: | | (Needs to be perfect condition) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NozMonkeys Stage 9 - ported throttle bodies

Joined: 26 Mar 2009 Posts: 1008 Location: Whangarei
1990 Nissan 300ZX NA
|
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Was I right about your car Zeeman? Or did I mislead you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|